The Case For A Presidential Science Debate
News > Politics

Friday, May 11, 2012 at 1:29 PM
Font size: A | A | A | A |

A group of science advocates say the American president should have the basic scientific know-how to understand policy challenges, evaluate options and devise solutions. Ira Flatow and guests discuss how a presidential science debate can help voters decide if a candidate is up for the job.

   
Related Articles
Why Race Could Color The Vote Against Obama
A new study shows hidden racial attitudes are playing a role in the 2012 presidential vote.
Balancing Budgets And R&D
Congressman Rush Holt argues for keeping research and development a key part of the federal budget.



This article is filed in: Politics, Science, U.S. News

Also in Politics  
Latino Voters: Seen, But Will They Be Heard, In 2012?
Now the fastest growing voting group, Latinos could play a key role in battleground states.

Candidates Gird For A 'Scorched Earth' Campaign
Obama has launched attack ads that are unusually blunt for an incumbent. And Romney has hit back.

Candidates Gird For A 'Scorched Earth' Campaign
Obama has launched attack ads that are unusually blunt for an incumbent. And Romney has hit back.

Biden On Bain: Romney 'Thinks This Experience Will Help Our Economy'?
The vice president questions what Mitt Romney's business experience might mean for the U.S. economy.

Minority Rules: Who Gets To Claim Status As A Person Of Color?
Controversy over Elizabeth Warren's heritage raise larger questions about how we judge ethnicity.

Comments  
Post a Comment